My reasoning is similar to xitout s as i will be outside of the rack and i don t do kipping pull ups.
Rogue rml 3wc fold back wall mount rack review.
The folding design forces a tad bit of play in some joints making it not feel as solid as a comparable 2 x3 rack.
The rogue rml 3wc fold back squat rack is a very popular space saving squat rack for home gym owners.
Space saving power rack made in the usa.
The only possible benefit i could see for the 41 5 is if you decide to diy a way to lift inside the rack e g.
For the price the rml 3w fold back wall mount rack is a great buy.
The prx profile series is unique in that it stows away vertically rather than to the side like most folding racks.
That goes for all similar wall mounted squat racks.
Maybe mount rails along the wall parallel to the folding ones and be able to use safety bars.
It s also about 350 more expensive.
If not then we suggest getting a stand alone rack due to increased versatility.
505 lb is beyond the limit as you can see in the below ig video where a screw ripped out of the stringer.
The central design challenge with the fold back rack was to come up with a wall mount unit that could be folded inward or outward for optimal.
The biggest competition for this rack is probably the prx profile which is also a wall mounted folding system.
My recommendation would be to reverse engineer it if you are putting it in a garage due to having a pitch downward.
Utilizing gas shocks it s probably the quickest and easiest folding rack to pull down and put away.
The prx profile also is the most compact of any folding racks sticking out only 4 from the wall when stowed away.
Rogue rml 3w fold back wall mount rack is rated 4 9 out of 5 by 675.
In our review we ve found the rml 3w to be an excellent folding rack if you plan to actually disassemble the pull up bar and fold it away.
They can wobble a little under loads.
Prx profile series rack.
Rated 5 out of 5 by james1234567890 from amazing for any home this is a perfect addition to your home gym.
Regardless this rack has the typical level of quality we ve come.